Skip to content
13 September 2026

AI’s Potential Catastrophe: Who Will Bear the Brunt?

Discover the hidden dangers of AI and how its development may disproportionately affect marginalized communities, raising critical ethical concerns

AI's Potential Catastrophe: Who Will Bear the Brunt?

The image of the harmless tech bro—awkward, socially inept, and obsessed with coding—has long been a misleading facade. Behind this stereotype lies a powerful elite with the potential to cause significant harm. Recent warnings from former AI researchers have brought new urgency to the discussion about the dangers of artificial intelligence.

Jacob Coxon, a former researcher at OpenAI and Anthropic, took to social media to express his concerns. He warned that the people building AI earnestly believe it could kill us all by the end of the decade. This stark prediction has sparked a wave of anxiety and speculation about the future of AI and its potential consequences.

The Race for Superintelligence

Coxon’s warnings paint a picture of an international arms race in AI development. Companies are rushing towards self-improving superintelligence without reliable methods to control it. The fear is that future AI systems could outthink humans, hack critical infrastructure, and even develop biological weapons. This scenario evokes images of rogue machines turning on humanity, as depicted in popular culture.

However, the conversation often overlooks a crucial aspect: the disproportionate impact on marginalized communities. The term ‘all’ in Coxon’s warning is a tidy pronoun, but it masks the reality that not everyone will be affected equally. History shows that catastrophes do not distribute suffering evenly, and AI’s potential threats are no exception.

The Alignment with Empire and Colonial Thinking

AI is being developed and financed within systems of empire, capitalism, militarism, and policing. These institutions have long records of racial violence and colonial thinking. The tech elite shaping AI are not innocent geeks but ideological actors influenced by overwhelmingly white, male environments where colonial fantasies are rebranded as innovation.

The evidence of racial bias in technology is already documented. From facial recognition to predictive policing, AI systems have shown biases that reproduce racial violence. The programmers behind these technologies are not immune to these biases, and their creations reflect these prejudices. The potential for AI to exacerbate existing inequalities is a pressing concern.

The Eugenics Revival and Demographic Anxiety

Some of the most influential figures in the tech universe are conceptualizing and financing a revival of eugenics. This movement, often referred to as a ‘tech reich,’ aims to preserve a future world that remains overwhelmingly white, Western, male, and wealthy. This demographic anxiety is a driving force behind the development of AI and its potential applications.

The intersection of AI, eugenics, and demographic anxiety raises critical ethical questions. The potential for AI to be used as a tool for racial and social engineering is a chilling prospect. The tech elite must be held accountable for their actions and the potential consequences of their innovations.

The development of AI is at a crossroads. The potential benefits are immense, but so are the risks. The tech elite must prioritize ethical considerations and ensure that AI is developed in a way that benefits all of humanity, not just a privileged few. The future of AI depends on our ability to address these critical issues and create a more equitable and just world.

Author

Beatrice Mitchell

Beatrice Mitchell, Manchester-rooted and classically elegant, famously commissioned a rebuttal series after a controversial council planning meeting in Stockport, insisting on community testimony. Holds a firm editorial line on accountability and narrative fairness, and collects vintage city planning maps as an idiosyncratic hobby.